An interesting question that came up during our workshop (slides here) at the community 2.0 conference was whether CMO’s and their marketing departments are changing with the advent of successful customer communities.

The answer so far is unfortunately: no… While a majority of customer community initiatives seems to migrate towards marketing, they are doing so by accident – not by design. In fact we have seen cases where communities were transitioned under marketing, only to have marketing push back and have them end up with the CFO.

It makes sense for customer communities to end up under marketing – whether new product innovation communities, customer support communities or marketing communities. But they should come with a transformation of the CMO role and that of their marketing department – one in which they become the representative of the voice of the customer within the company instead of the brand builders or the sales support department.

Unfortunately, and in a majority of the cases that we surveyed as part of our study, that is not what is happening. In companies with large marketing budgets, community spending is too small to even make it on the radar screen of the CMO – who often manages the importance of programs and initiatives relative to marketing dollars spent on it. In many companies, the CMO does not have the mandate to represent the voice of the customer within the company – sometimes having no say on new product innovation and in most cases being completely detached from customer support. Yet when looking at companies like Zappos.com, you could argue that customer support is the new sales and marketing channel.

So where does that lead us? For those companies who are not transforming the role of the CMO and their marketing departments, many community activities will fail – as there is no connection between what customers do and expect in those communities and the internal business processes that can actually make things happen. In the long run, and because of the game-changing nature of successful communities, those marketing departments will become totally irrelevant to the company strategy.

According to the CMO Council’s latest annual Marketing Outlook survey (via Marketing Charts), CMOs are upbeat about spend levels, which are supposed to stay steady or trend higher, and frustrated and stymied by organizational culture, senior management mindsets, and insufficient budgets.

According to the survey, more dollars are going towards the analytics side of the business and the use of more tangible and targeted forms of personal interaction, contextual communication and online demand generation.

When asked how they measured success of their marketing spend (well they were asked for return on marketing spend – more on that later), 20% of respondents said they were not measuring marketing ROIs, and 32% said they were planning to introduce a formal ROI tracking system.

The leading area of marketing dollar allocation – strategy & branding! Following that are events and trade shows, operations, direct marketing, sales support, online marketing, advertising, and market research.

The main reasons why marketers switch agencies – which was very frequently, with 41% who switched ad agencies – are:

• Lack of innovation
• No value-added thinking
• Poor creative
• Quality of work
• Results and deliverables

Duh – maybe all the interrupt-based stuff that they use is just not working anymore

Unfortunately, the increased focus on ROI will likely not be the expected savior that will return credibility to the marketing department. First off, ROI-driven companies are often focusing their measurements on transaction-based buying activities. In the long run, however, it is not the efficacy with which you can get one person to buy something once that counts, but rather the customer lifecycle value and the ongoing amplification in the form of word of mouth that goes along with a long term customer relation. ROI is also a trailing indicator, and as all financial services companies will tell you – past performance is not an indicator of future results. Lastly, and by measuring ROI on discreet processes (i.e., a specific lead generation campaign), which most companies who measure ROI do, companies are reducing marketing to a collection of simple linear processes, when in reality it is a complex multi-variable and non-linear system. So by oversimplifying marketing to make it measurable, many companies will actually break marketing more so than it already is.

Nowhere in the survey was there any mention of consumer generated content – somewhat of a surprise considering that fewer and fewer buyers make their buying decisions based on information coming from the vendors.

A new report jointly produced between Forrester Research and Heidrick & Struggles paints a bleak picture of the (d)evolved CMO (Chief Marketing Officer). You can download the report here, but only after agreeing to become a “lead.”

While two thirds of CMOs want to get a higher involvement with business strategy development and increased P&L responsibility, the reality is that far too many of them are in fact disconnected from where the real action is.

Some of the findings are mind-boggling:

• Only 45% of CMOs have responsibility for product, service or solution development. Only 37.5% are responsible for pricing.
• Only 27.5% are in charge of sales  training.
• Only 25% are responsible for in-store buying experiences.
• Only 12.5% are accountable for the activities associated with customer service and support.

How can you be the Chief Market Listener and not be in charge of what customers say after they buy your product? If you are the Chief Market Officer, how can you not be in charge of deciding what gets sold in the marketplace and how much it will cost the buyer to acquire it? And if you are the Chief Customer Officer, how can you not be in charge for the in-store customer experience? The sales training issue is either a cause or effect for the ongoing rift between most sales and marketing department…

But wait, it gets worse…here is some data about their top objectives:

• Only 27.5% have “increase customer life-cycle value” as one of their top objectives.
• “Innovate” is an objective for only 40% of the survey takers
• Only 27.5% have “increase customer retention” as an objective

And just when you thought you got the extend of the sorry state of CMOs, you find this:

• Only 12% consider “personal knowledge of your customers” as one of their top 5 competencies to their personal success.
• Only 17% consider technology savviness to be one of those top 5 skills

Thankfully (sarcasm intended), more than 65% see people management as one of those top skills. But wait a minute…isn’t it leadership characteristics that get you into the C-suite? Management skills are so Industrial Revolution/last century skills…

Other interesting tidbits from the report include:

• On a scale from 1-3, with 3 being the most important, CMOs found marketing measurement (2.55) to be way more important than customer community development ((1.89) and social computing/web 2.0 tools (1.73).  That goes hand-in-hand with the fact that 92% have advertising as one of their main responsibilities.
• There is room for new industry marketing organizations, conferences and publications. Those three resources come in dead last in a list of 16 resources that CMOs ranked most valuable to their professional career development.

 The recommendations from the authors to improve the situation?

• Spend more time on career development
• Seize the opportunity to lead the organization towards customer-centricity
• Build credibility through the marketing team and leadership contributions.

How about not accepting the CMO job if it does not mean you are really the Chief Market Officer, or the Chief Customer Listener, or the Chief Voice of the Customer Officer, or the Chief Customer Lifecycle Value Owner?