fast cash

Sneak peek at the early findings of the Social Workplace Trust Study

September 19th, 2012 francois Posted in adoption of innovation, announcements, culture 6.0, human resources, Hyper Social Enterprise, Risk intelligence, social media, Strategy 1 Comment »

Today we released preliminary results of the Social Workplace Trust Study, a study that was co-sponsored between Human 1.0, The Great Place to Work Institute, The International Association of Business Communicators, and The Society for New Communications Research. We will post the recording of the webinar in which we previewed a sneak peek of the results tomorrow, and you can find a copy of the deck we used on Slideshare.

So why did we release a sneak peek of the findings?

We truly believe that there is so much in the data that the more we socialize it with people who have an interest in the topic the better the findings from the study will be. If you are interested in discussing the data with us, please contact me at francois [at] human1 [dot] com.

So what are some of the high level findings?

Finding # 1 – most respondents believe that the best way to learn about a company is through social media and that the accuracy of information about a company is higher in social media than on company websites.

The people who agreed with the statement “One of the best ways for a person to learn about a company is by using social media” outnumbered those that disagreed by a factor 1.5X. When we asked the same question from heavy users of social media, that factor became a whopping 15X, and when we asked the question to people outside of the marketing and communication functions, that factor became 2X.

The respondent who agreed to the statement “What I read about a company on social media is more accurate than what I read about the company on its own website” also outnumbered those that disagreed by a factor 1.5X. When we asked the heavy social media users, that factor became 5.5X, and without the communication and marketing functions, the factor became 2.4X.

Finding #2 – if you treat your employees as adults, instead of as children, you can expect a work environment with higher trust, higher loyalty, and higher employee self-esteem.

Treating an employee as an adult encompasses many cultural traits – including risk, trust, hierarchy, passion, and a set of human-centric belief systems. We used the answers to 5 questions from the survey as proxies for determining whether employees were treated as adults or children. The subsequent findings were amazing.

People that are treated as adults are 3.3X as likely to trust management, they are 2X more loyal to the company, they have 1.7X as much job satisfaction, they take pride in talking about their work with others that is 2X that of people treated as children, and 1.5X as many people who are treated as adults consider themselves having larger social networks than others. Now can you see the benefits that companies who treat their employees as adults must be gaining in terms of talent acquisition and retention, increased innovation and word of mouth?

Not only are the benefits not incremental, they are totally non-linear. If you treat an employee as an adult, not only will they participate in conversations about their company in social media by a factor 3.3X compared to those treated as children, with 1.5X as many of them having larger than average social networks, they will buzz more to more people – and therein lays just one of the exponents.

We also found a clear link between treating employees as adults and passion. The factor there is between 2X and 12X – that means that people who are treated as adults are 2-12X as likely to be passionate at work. Now if you are familiar with some of John Hagel’s work on passion, he found that people who are passionate at work are 2X as likely to tackle tough problems and have social networks that are 2X as large as those that do not have passion at work. Again, can you see the benefits in terms of knowledge flow and innovation?

We have many other findings, including how management actually does live in a “bubble”, how there might be an employee engagement gap, how many companies still discourage the use of social media, and how they fail to use social media to humanize their brands.

Another key finding is how companies expose themselves to significant risks and liabilities by not providing training or “guard rails” on the proper use of social media to their employees.

Again, those results are preliminary. We are still conducting qualitative interviews and cross-tabulating survey results, but if you would like to get involved and make it better before we release the final findings, please be in touch.



AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Are you risk intelligent or risk illiterate when it comes to social media?

December 21st, 2010 francois Posted in announcements, Risk intelligence, Social Messiness 2 Comments »

In speaking with Ed Moran the other day, the co-author of the award-winning Hyper-Social Organization, he brought up a great term – risk intelligence about social media.

When it comes to social media, many companies decide not to participate, which is a risk-averse reaction to the messiness that comes with the social, but which in itself contains a ton of risks. Countless other companies have no social media policies, which in itself is very risky as well. Those companies are not just risk-averse, they are clueless when it comes to risks associated with social media.

They need to become risk-intelligent.

But what does that mean?

  1. You need to understand the risks of doing nothing or the risk of resisting adoption
    You can decide to do nothing, or worse, try to fight it. That won’t stop your customers and employees from using it anyway. By not listening and engaging with what is being said, you risk becoming another Dell Hell. By resisting it you will have to start behaving like North Korea. Both carry unbelievable risks – do you understand them and are you willing to take those?
  2. You need to understand the unintended consequences of good social media programs
    Even good social media programs can go awry.  You could get technical glitches that compromises people’s privacy as they are interacting with you, which happened to many well known brands. Or people could hijack your minutiously  prepared plans into directions that you never intended. Or you might announce something only to find out that your organization is not ready to execute on the plan. So many things can go wrong, and when they do in networked environments, they spread like wildfire.
  3. You need to be prepared to mitigate risks while encouraging use and embracing the messiness that comes with it
    You need to have policies to mitigate the risks of social media. At the same time you need to develop those policies in such a way that they encourage your employees to become active players in social media on behalf of the brand. If you create policies that are threatening, people will not use it and you will find yourself back at step 1 – not a good place to be and certainly not a risk-free place.

So you need to become risk intelligent and you need to realize that not doing so can have financial risks, legal/IP risks, competitive risks, and safety risks, just to name a few.

At our upcoming Hyper-Social Summit, we will be joined by Risk Management professionals from many leading companies and will dedicate a good amount of time at understanding what it takes to become risk intelligent about social media. We hope you can join us. The early bird special ends today and you can use ‘friendsofhuman1′ (no quotes) to get an extra 20% off the $500 we charge to defray costs.



AddThis Social Bookmark Button