« links for 2007-01-30 | Main | Ridiculous Business Jargon Dictionary to the rescue of non corporate jargon users »

January 30, 2007

More research on viral marketing - and supporting the limited role of "influentials"

(Posted by francois to: Consumer generated media | marketing | word of mouth )

Right on the heels of learning that the influentials may in fact not be all that influential in causing trends and other social "epidemics", here comes more research (pdf) confirming the limited role of the influentials and heeding marketers that some viral marketing techniques could easily backfire on them.

Jure Leskoved from Carnegie Mellon, Lada Adamic from the University of Michigan and Bernardo Huberman from HP Labs collaborated on this research project where they looked at the dynamics of viral marketing.

Here are some of their findings:


This paper also exposes the potential long term negative effects of commercializing relationships on the value of personal recommendations and word of mouth in general - a practice used aggressively by some well known marketers.

[Tags: ]


Posted by francois at January 30, 2007 06:50 AM | Bookmark This

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.emergencemarketing.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/874

Comments

I think we have to avoid a bi-modal 'all or nothing' model in terms of influencing. Influence mechanisms are well studied in social sciences. They tend to follow a non-linear pattern (excuse my language) where small screw-ups have the potential of destroying a lot of influence-capital that you may have accumulated. In my research in organizations, influence mechanisms in internal social networks matter a lot, and I have explained this in my book 'Viral Change: the alternative to slow, painful and unsucessful management of change in organizations' These internal influence-nodes have little to do with established hierarchy for example. Once the internal epidemic ( new ideas, new fashion, new changes...) has started, it spreads via those influence nodes AND also ( here Watts supposedly new findings for example) any other mortal via imitation and diffusion. It is more complex than the rather standard, simplistic model often associated with viral marketing - Leandro Herrero

Posted by: Leandro Herrero at January 30, 2007 08:17 AM

Leonardo - I could not agree with you more. It is much more complex than the latest WOM fad would lead you to believe.

Posted by: francois gossieaux at February 2, 2007 10:18 AM

Francois, Leandro

Leandro's comment reminds me of my own experiences driving change at large corporations. In contrast to many of my colleagues, I have long believed that concentrating on influencing social networks is the key to effecting lasting change, rather than the more traditional combination of top-down leadership, communication & training espoused by most change consultants.

In fact I enjoyed his comment so much I went out and bought his book. Having read through the first chapter this evening, it looks like the perfect antidote to much of the out-of-date thinking on change that sit on my consultant's library.

Take a look at some of Ralph Stacey's work on Organisational Dynamics for more of the same.

Graham Hill
Independent Management Consultant

Posted by: GrahamHill at February 9, 2007 02:26 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)