CMO 2.0 Influencer Conversation with John Hagel
I had a lot of fun conducting this CMO 2.0 Influencer Conversation with John Hagel, the Co-Chair of the Center For the Edge at Deloitte, and one of my all time favorite business thinkers.
John started off by explaining the meaning behind the name of the center which he co-leads with John Seely Brown – the Center For The Edge. For them, the edges are those areas on the periphery where you first see emerging new opportunities. The challenge with the growth opportunities at the edges is to scale them – either by connecting them to the core where all the money and all the people are, through collaboration, or through competition. There are many different types of edges, including geographic ones (think China, India), demographic edges (e.g., the younger generation entering the workforce), marketplaces with unmet needs, or technology edges. The key take-away for executives is to keep focusing on those edges as they are the places where future growth opportunities will first show up. They also need to realize that many of those edges are not part of their organizations or their existing ecosystems.
Next we talked about the newly released Shift Index, a set of three indices and 25 metrics designed to make longer-term performance trends more relevant and actionable (you can download the full report here). The Index, which was based on a yearlong research project, helps explain, among other things, the intensification of competition that many companies are witnessing today, and which has lead to the mean for company survival to come down to 10 years compared to 75 years in the 1930’s. Other metrics within the index help executives measure the consequences of that intensifying competition and also allow them to measure their performance relative to others. The research also uncovered some concerning trends – one of which is that ROA (Return On Asset) in the US decreased by 75% in the last four decades. And that in the face of consistent increases in labor productivity over that same period.
One of the key conclusions of the study is that competition is intensifying and that companies are not doing so well – their existing management practices are not keeping up with the changes.
We talked about some of the things that companies can do in order to cope with the changes afoot. One of those is to shift from a knowledge stock mentality, where you aggressively protect and hoard proprietary knowledge, build scalable offerings around it, and then extract value from it for the longest possible time, to a knowledge flow mentality, where you realize that what you know today has rapidly diminishing value and where you refresh your knowledge stocks by participating in knowledge flows. One of the big challenges for companies is that unlike information or data flows, knowledge does not flow easily – as it relies on long-term trust-based relationships. So the key to success in this new economic reality is to move from a transactional world to a long-term trust-based world. Examples of taking on a knowledge flow approach include letting your key customers participate in product innovation, or turning them into affiliates to allow them to help one another.
In this increasingly fast-cycle world, John believes that the role of serendipity will be progressively more important. He defines serendipity as “unexpected encounters that are valuable and generate pleasure when you encounter them,” and rather than believe that serendipity is based on pure luck, he believes that we can shape serendipity – both by increasing quality and quantity of unexpected ecounters. One way of doing that is by selecting location. By choosing a “spiky” physical location where there is a high concentration of talent you are much more likely to encounter serendipity than if you were on a farm in Iowa. The same is true for the virtual locations you decide to hang out in – whether social networks or communities. Choosing location by itself won’t do the trick however. If you want to shape serendipity you still need to set yourself up so that you are attracting attention, and increasing visibility and findability for yourself.
Another thing that companies need to focus on to better deal with this new economic reality is to shift from a push model to a pull model – one in which you attract partners, customers and talent, instead of pushing out products and messages. John reiterated the importance of shifting from an intercept, insulate and inhibit marketing mentality to one of attracting, assisting and affiliating customers and prospects.
We wrapped up by talking about John’s evolving views about business communities since he wrote Net Gain almost 12 years ago (to date, and in my biased opinion, probably still one of the most important books on business communities). He would reaffirm that there are huge challenges to building communities, but that if you build them around the needs of the members they can be very powerful. He would also expand on the need for three distinct, and sometimes conflicting, skill-sets or cultures that are required to ensure successful communities – centered around content, social interactions, and economic business models. Unfortunatelly, most communities only have one or two of those skill-sets engaged.
We also talked about:
- The need to shift from firewall around the company mentality to a modularized firewall around core company IP
- How you cannot participate in knowledge flows for very long if you are only a “taker”
- The importance of face-to-face in building trusted relationships
- The importance of having hyper-local face-to-face components in large online community
- The balance between the need to increase the number of partners we engage with with the need to build deep relationships in order to allow knowledge flow
- The talent Dilbert paradox and how talent is motivated by the talent development
- How you need a high growth strategy to attract and keep talent
- The importance of the “collaboration curve” in scaling the organizational learning, which they described in detail on their new blog - The Big Shift
- The importance for companies to start adopting a federated view/architecture for their online community efforts
You can listen to the actual CMO 2.0 Influencer Conversation on the CMO 2.0 Conversation site and soon we will be putting up a transcript of this conversation.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.










July 9th, 2009 at 11:01 am
Thanks for the MP3, i’ll take a listen when i get home.
July 8th, 2009 at 8:21 am
New blog post: CMO 2.0 Influencer Conversation with John Hagel http://bit.ly/bbo42
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
July 8th, 2009 at 2:07 pm
CMO 2.0 Influencer Conversation with John Hagel: I had a lot of fun conducting this CMO 2.0 Influencer Conversat.. http://tinyurl.com/nn298x
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
July 14th, 2009 at 6:39 am
Good morning Valeria!
Wow, this is a great post because it conceptualizes blogging, and uses that info to solve a problem.
How do you "encourage the discussion we want," on a blog like Gizmodo? Delete all the posts that don’t help? Is that wrong, and will the angry, illiterate posters rant more?
Have a great one!
P.S. My mother, God bless her, taught me how to swear….which is probably why I ended up as a "passionate" person….
This comment was originally posted on Conversation Agent
July 14th, 2009 at 6:21 pm
We facilitate the conversation by encouraging different perspectives. We do that by curating content, and yes moderating comments and allowing for reasonable voices to emerge and respectful discourse to be rewarded.
Plus, it’s more fun to be civil in the end.
This comment was originally posted on Conversation Agent
July 15th, 2009 at 2:30 am
There always will be people who are not agreeing or rant about a product or services. That’s why we live in a "conversation age". Tools a company selects for monitoring and some censorship is always OK, when it lets the conversation flow in natural direction.
People, who are just flaming up the discussion with angry, negative and most of the time insulting comments are obstacles to the natural conversation flow and should be banned for the very good reason.
The problem with people not being satisfied with corporate SM strategy is that most of business are one step behind. But they are catching up fast! That’s already something.
This comment was originally posted on Conversation Agent
July 15th, 2009 at 10:11 am
Organizations are held back by a number of issues. The ones I hear from other marketers are (in no particular order):
1. Lack of agreement among management team how to tackle social media
2. Lack of understanding from the top on what exactly is social media and why the company should care
3. Not enough resources (not only the marketing dept is managing shows, website, advertising, lead generation, but now they also have to create a facebook page, blog, and twitter accounts)
4. "Not applicable to my industry" syndrome, in which companies think this social media thing is not impacting their particular turf
5. Fear (of doing it wrong, of not being able to keep up, etc.)
Another interesting question is: for those organizations that have taken the plunge, why some are so bad at it?
Thanks for the insightful post!
This comment was originally posted on Conversation Agent
July 16th, 2009 at 9:45 am
And there it is:
"But what holds us back – A "pack" weighed down with 100’s (if not 1000’s) of idea’s of what we should be doing in business."
Thanks Peter.
And since most companies lack a mental model to filter ideas and focus attention and activities, the pack gets removed and placed in a conference room. And everyone goes back to the thinking and actions which they’re most comfortable with, and which serves their near-term personal and professional interests.
This comment was originally posted on Conversation Agent
August 19th, 2009 at 4:07 am
New blog post: CMO 2.0 Influencer Conversation with John Hagel http://bit.ly/bbo42
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
August 27th, 2009 at 7:11 am
New blog post: CMO 2.0 Influencer Conversation with John Hagel http://bit.ly/bbo42
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
August 28th, 2009 at 7:02 pm
New blog post: CMO 2.0 Influencer Conversation with John Hagel http://bit.ly/bbo42 cool
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
August 29th, 2009 at 6:25 am
New blog post: CMO 2.0 Influencer Conversation with John Hagel http://bit.ly/bbo42 …
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
August 29th, 2009 at 10:48 pm
New blog post: CMO 2.0 Influencer Conversation with John Hagel http://bit.ly/bbo42 !
This comment was originally posted on Twitter