Artificially creating barriers to adoption…

I have been looking for a group “to-do” list for a long time, and never really found what I was looking for. Most to-do lists are for individual usage – which is not what I am looking for. And unless you are Google, I do not even get why people bother developing those apps as there are a ton of applications on people’s desktop that already have that service integrated – for free.

But as far as a simple group task list for truly distributed teams….there isn’t much available. I finally found a solution that looked promising….integrating/synchronizing with Google calendar, etc. – all for $15. So I bought it thinking that would solve my problem. Except that when I tried to invite one of my closest associates, it required that he too buy that same application. That was almost a week ago, and of course that has not happened yet.

How can people do that? Group applications already have plenty of barriers to adoption to overcome – so why a company would artificially add one extra barrier in the mix is a mystery to me. I bet you that most “potential” users of this app would use it with teams of 2-3 people. So if that is the case, charge the buyer of the app $30-50 instead of trying to get $15 from all the users. That way you may end up with some real users instead of frustrated buyers.

Elementary…my dear Watson…

[Tags: ]

0saves
If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.



AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Leave a Reply

Additional comments powered by BackType