<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sex in ads does not sell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.emergencemarketing.com/2005/10/25/sex-in-ads-does-not-sell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.emergencemarketing.com/2005/10/25/sex-in-ads-does-not-sell/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on marketing, innovation, social networking, new products and the impact of technology on all those thingies</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paperholic</title>
		<link>http://www.emergencemarketing.com/2005/10/25/sex-in-ads-does-not-sell/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Paperholic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergencemarketing.com/?p=413#comment-195</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Trend: Werbung hat ausgesext und wird humorvoll&lt;/strong&gt;

Was jemanden stören könne, aber die Masse nicht mehr zum Kauf bewege, sei zusehends verpönt, lesen wir auf persönlich.com (3. Februar). Und auch der Titel des Artikels ist irgendwie windschief:Sex in der Werbung: Kampagnen fallen bei Jungen durch.A...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<script type='text/javascript' src='http://www.sezwho.com/widgets/profile/js_output/wp/limau-orange-01/1.3/1.3/89751d15b267e1e29548f9cf03bfdada/475d4e1070baa'></script><script type="text/javascript">var sz_global_config_params = {cppluginurl:"http://www.emergencemarketing.com/wp-content/plugins/sezwho",cpserverurl:"http://www.sezwho.com", sitekey:"89751d15b267e1e29548f9cf03bfdada",blogkey:"475d4e1070baa",blogid:"0", plugin_version:"1.3"} ; </script><p><strong>Trend: Werbung hat ausgesext und wird humorvoll</strong></p>
<p>Was jemanden stören könne, aber die Masse nicht mehr zum Kauf bewege, sei zusehends verpönt, lesen wir auf persönlich.com (3. Februar). Und auch der Titel des Artikels ist irgendwie windschief:Sex in der Werbung: Kampagnen fallen bei Jungen durch.A&#8230;<script type="text/javascript" id="szCommentHiddenTag:195">var sz_comment_config_params = {use_cross_domain_posting:1,post_id:"413", comment_rating_submit_path:"/cpratingsubmit.php",sortOrder:"",sz_auto_comment:0,sz_auto_option_bar:0,comment_number:3, sz_comment_data:[]};sz_comment_config_params.sz_comment_data[0]= {comment_id:"195", comment_author:"Paperholic", comment_author_url:"http://www.paperholic.com/weblog/?p=1172", comment_author_email:"",sz_score:"0",comment_score:"0"};</script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TishGrier</title>
		<link>http://www.emergencemarketing.com/2005/10/25/sex-in-ads-does-not-sell/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>TishGrier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 09:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergencemarketing.com/?p=413#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Hi Francois,

I tend to agree with the "numbing effect" idea.

Case in point:  walking down the street in Northampton, MA I noticed how many of the college-age girls were walking around in outfits that would have been considered appropriate for hookers about 15 or 20 years ago.  I realized that my perspective on these outfits was colored by the fact that I'm outside the 18-34 age demographic that pop culture is aimed at.  So, I wondered about the young men...and how they thought about it...and they really didn't think what I thought--that the girls looked like hookers.

So, in a media saturated with sexual imagery, my conclusion, anecdotally, is that it effects those who are older (or very young) moreso than those it is directly aimed at.

talk about missing the mark.

But in blog searches, my sense (from what I've gleaned from my stats on two very different blogs) is that sex is still a major curiosity and is probably the most searched term than anything having to do with non-sexually oriented Information.  So, bloggers may be into Information, but the *kind* of information they're interested in, is, well, would spurious be too harsh a term?

T.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Francois,</p>
<p>I tend to agree with the &#8220;numbing effect&#8221; idea.</p>
<p>Case in point:  walking down the street in Northampton, MA I noticed how many of the college-age girls were walking around in outfits that would have been considered appropriate for hookers about 15 or 20 years ago.  I realized that my perspective on these outfits was colored by the fact that I&#8217;m outside the 18-34 age demographic that pop culture is aimed at.  So, I wondered about the young men&#8230;and how they thought about it&#8230;and they really didn&#8217;t think what I thought&#8211;that the girls looked like hookers.</p>
<p>So, in a media saturated with sexual imagery, my conclusion, anecdotally, is that it effects those who are older (or very young) moreso than those it is directly aimed at.</p>
<p>talk about missing the mark.</p>
<p>But in blog searches, my sense (from what I&#8217;ve gleaned from my stats on two very different blogs) is that sex is still a major curiosity and is probably the most searched term than anything having to do with non-sexually oriented Information.  So, bloggers may be into Information, but the *kind* of information they&#8217;re interested in, is, well, would spurious be too harsh a term?</p>
<p>T.<script type="text/javascript" id="szCommentHiddenTag:194">sz_comment_config_params.sz_comment_data[1]= {comment_id:"194", comment_author:"TishGrier", comment_author_url:"http://spap-oop.blogspot.com", comment_author_email:"YmkOHKkfUfWWi85CLf7hbjVYY68Y5jznF8bjXtgvZ7AGaPBUauF3vsNQEjNPMQxhTMtr7I4ysvjepY4Sgll2ZHuDfgFgB4j2ooRiGvSgZgc9G4m%2FJipPAJxfkh1cAAos82rLmq2XaKySALtGrDpeibP2lGJvllRMLy6o6SNgVzo%3D",sz_score:"6.0",comment_score:"5.0"};</script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olivier blanchard</title>
		<link>http://www.emergencemarketing.com/2005/10/25/sex-in-ads-does-not-sell/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>olivier blanchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergencemarketing.com/?p=413#comment-193</guid>
		<description>Yep.  Check &lt;a href="http://thebrandbuilder.blogspot.com/2005/08/reach-your-audience.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; out:

Erotic and violent images may actually cloud viewers' ability to focus on the actual object of the ad.

"We observed that people fail to detect visual images that appeared one-fifth of a second after emotional images, whereas they can detect those images with little problem after viewing neutral images," says Vanderbilt University psychologist David Zald.

The effect is known as attentional rubbernecking.

"We think that there is essentially a bottleneck for information processing and if a certain type of stimulus captures attention, it can basically jam up that bottleneck so subsequent information can't get through," says Zald.

In other words, although a provocative or visually loud ad is likely to grab your attention, it also hinders your ability to focus on the brand or product it promotes.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep.  Check <a href="http://thebrandbuilder.blogspot.com/2005/08/reach-your-audience.html" rel="nofollow">this</a> out:</p>
<p>Erotic and violent images may actually cloud viewers&#8217; ability to focus on the actual object of the ad.</p>
<p>&#8220;We observed that people fail to detect visual images that appeared one-fifth of a second after emotional images, whereas they can detect those images with little problem after viewing neutral images,&#8221; says Vanderbilt University psychologist David Zald.</p>
<p>The effect is known as attentional rubbernecking.</p>
<p>&#8220;We think that there is essentially a bottleneck for information processing and if a certain type of stimulus captures attention, it can basically jam up that bottleneck so subsequent information can&#8217;t get through,&#8221; says Zald.</p>
<p>In other words, although a provocative or visually loud ad is likely to grab your attention, it also hinders your ability to focus on the brand or product it promotes.<script type="text/javascript" id="szCommentHiddenTag:193">sz_comment_config_params.sz_comment_data[2]= {comment_id:"193", comment_author:"olivier%20blanchard", comment_author_url:"http://thebrandbuilder.blogspot.com", comment_author_email:"zUrc7QAGRY%2BK6UJte2R5R1dzKKo1ZoXnaKYMsL5NfuO6ns9FEK0N5tFlBPtXoBX8OZW8jh3DL5aEVSDoSM2beSNXqjt%2B9awxwHoW%2BWlUZy9FoA82TpY7P62KgGWvK7i4oDofyG67zf%2BikOabBEKXIXJXi4V6Kp1daWvHRK0NEbQ%3D",sz_score:"5.0",comment_score:"5.0"};if(!(!(/Safari|Konqueror|KHTML/gi).test(navigator.userAgent) &&!navigator.userAgent.match(/opera/gi) && navigator.userAgent.match(/msie/gi))) if (window.SezWho.Utils.callJSFramework)SezWho.Utils.callJSFramework();</script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
