<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WOM and Botox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.emergencemarketing.com/2005/09/29/wom-and-botox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.emergencemarketing.com/2005/09/29/wom-and-botox/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on marketing, innovation, social networking, new products and the impact of technology on all those thingies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:00:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.emergencemarketing.com/2005/09/29/wom-and-botox/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Kgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 20:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergencemarketing.com/?p=364#comment-157</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure why a Botox party is offensive.  Is a Mary Kaye party less so because the products are only applied to the skin surface, not below it?  I&#039;m intrigued by the source of the social stigma associated with Botox and other common treatments.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure why a Botox party is offensive.  Is a Mary Kaye party less so because the products are only applied to the skin surface, not below it?  I&#8217;m intrigued by the source of the social stigma associated with Botox and other common treatments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

