<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marketing to older people &#8211; lock-in opportunities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.emergencemarketing.com/2005/06/20/marketing-to-older-people-lock-in-opportunities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.emergencemarketing.com/2005/06/20/marketing-to-older-people-lock-in-opportunities/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on marketing, innovation, social networking, new products and the impact of technology on all those thingies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:00:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jule Mecca</title>
		<link>http://www.emergencemarketing.com/2005/06/20/marketing-to-older-people-lock-in-opportunities/comment-page-1/#comment-6438</link>
		<dc:creator>Jule Mecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 03:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergencemarketing.com/?p=141#comment-6438</guid>
		<description>Hello thanks to you for the entry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello thanks to you for the entry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simit</title>
		<link>http://www.emergencemarketing.com/2005/06/20/marketing-to-older-people-lock-in-opportunities/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>simit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergencemarketing.com/?p=141#comment-80</guid>
		<description>I think, as the world continues to evolve, that our definition of &quot;old&quot; must change as well. While today &quot;old&quot; may generally be associated with people who are 50+, tomorrow one may not be considered old until they hit 70, or even longer. For this reason the lock-in value of baby boomers may be smaller than it seems, in my opinion.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think, as the world continues to evolve, that our definition of &#8220;old&#8221; must change as well. While today &#8220;old&#8221; may generally be associated with people who are 50+, tomorrow one may not be considered old until they hit 70, or even longer. For this reason the lock-in value of baby boomers may be smaller than it seems, in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

