<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marketing to older people - lock-in opportunities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.emergencemarketing.com/2005/06/20/marketing-to-older-people-lock-in-opportunities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.emergencemarketing.com/2005/06/20/marketing-to-older-people-lock-in-opportunities/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on marketing, innovation, social networking, new products and the impact of technology on all those thingies</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: simit</title>
		<link>http://www.emergencemarketing.com/2005/06/20/marketing-to-older-people-lock-in-opportunities/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>simit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergencemarketing.com/?p=141#comment-80</guid>
		<description>I think, as the world continues to evolve, that our definition of "old" must change as well. While today "old" may generally be associated with people who are 50+, tomorrow one may not be considered old until they hit 70, or even longer. For this reason the lock-in value of baby boomers may be smaller than it seems, in my opinion.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<script type='text/javascript' src='http://www.sezwho.com/widgets/profile/js_output/wp/limau-orange-01/1.3/1.3/89751d15b267e1e29548f9cf03bfdada/475d4e1070baa'></script><script type="text/javascript">var sz_global_config_params = {cppluginurl:"http://www.emergencemarketing.com/wp-content/plugins/sezwho",cpserverurl:"http://www.sezwho.com", sitekey:"89751d15b267e1e29548f9cf03bfdada",blogkey:"475d4e1070baa",blogid:"0", plugin_version:"1.3"} ; </script><p>I think, as the world continues to evolve, that our definition of &#8220;old&#8221; must change as well. While today &#8220;old&#8221; may generally be associated with people who are 50+, tomorrow one may not be considered old until they hit 70, or even longer. For this reason the lock-in value of baby boomers may be smaller than it seems, in my opinion.<script type="text/javascript" id="szCommentHiddenTag:80">var sz_comment_config_params = {use_cross_domain_posting:1,post_id:"141", comment_rating_submit_path:"/cpratingsubmit.php",sortOrder:"",sz_auto_comment:0,sz_auto_option_bar:0,comment_number:1, sz_comment_data:[]};sz_comment_config_params.sz_comment_data[0]= {comment_id:"80", comment_author:"simit", comment_author_url:"http://www.actonetwork.com", comment_author_email:"uG0X9jREa%2Fc9cNv6YFEHtcxRZc2xEEZ1V%2FcFWZnL50fnYjahLnlfALbcvYuCbMsDcR2%2FTJRcILuJ7Hoy7dq%2FA3JAMky4yHF8pjgDpU%2Fc23R6PNlGhJQ9vuDSUvJ9nSDAyn9NUwHBLyvjwUVYRPSy5vmxkFetCHBFR%2FEuDvExQOI%3D",sz_score:"5.0",comment_score:"5.0"};if(!(!(/Safari|Konqueror|KHTML/gi).test(navigator.userAgent) &&!navigator.userAgent.match(/opera/gi) && navigator.userAgent.match(/msie/gi))) if (window.SezWho.Utils.callJSFramework)SezWho.Utils.callJSFramework();</script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
