Taxonomy for cooperation technologies

Howard Rheingold and a few of his colleagues created a report and a visual map (here) on technologies of cooperation for the Institute for the Future (announced here on the feature).

They categorize the emerging cooperation-amplifying technologies into 8 categories. I really like some of their categorizations – such as “knowledge collectives” to talk about social bookmarking sites, or “social accounting” for sites like Epinions.

The report concludes with 7 guidelines:

  • Shift focus from designing systems to providing platforms
  • Engage the community in designing rules to match their culture,
    objectives, and tools; encourage peer contracts in place of coercive
    sanctions by distant authority when possible
  • Learn how to recognize untapped or invisible resources
  • Identify key thresholds for achieving “phase shifts” in behavior
    or performance
  • Track and foster diverse and emergent feedback loops
  • Look for ways to convert present knowledge into deep memory
  • Support participatory identity

[Technorati Tags: ]

0saves
If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.



AddThis Social Bookmark Button

One Response to “Taxonomy for cooperation technologies”

  1. May I Have Your Attention?

    A year or so ago, I wrote about momentary advantages in business. There’s a new frame of reference for value creation that demands creativity, flexibility, and execution. Ideascape makes it easier for your employees to cut through the clutter of informati

Leave a Reply

Additional comments powered by BackType